Book Review: The Black Hat Eccentric

January-March 2013

The Black Hat Eccentric: Artistic Visions of the Tenth Karmapa

By Karl Debreczeny with contributions by Ian A. Alsop, David P. Jackson and Irmgard Mengele

Rubin Museum of Art, New York; University of Washington Press 2012

The Black Hat Eccentric: Artistic Visions of the Tenth Karmapa by Karl Debreczeny is at once a fascinating story of an unconventional artist and his times, and a landmark contribution to Tibetan studies. Debreczeny writes, “The life story of the Tenth Karmapa provides insight into the lives of Tibetan artists, who are typically absent from discussions of Tibetan art (65).” This book addresses this curious state of art history within Tibetan studies by offering the first publication about a single Tibetan artist, with a strong focus on “the hand of the master.”

The Tenth Karmapa, Chöying Dorjé (1604-1674), head of the Karma Kagyu school, was not a professional artist, but in Debreczeny’s words “painting and sculpture was his passion (65).” Chöying Dorjé’s painting style was very different from “the mainstream Tibetan painting of his time (69),” which was dominated by the Menri style from the mid-fifteenth century. Menri is known for its predominance of blue and green palette, strict iconography and iconometry [artistic conventions for the proportions of buddhas, deities and so forth], and a symmetrical composition crowded with details that fill the canvas. Chöying Dorjé was trained in part by his religious teacher, the Sixth Shamar, as well as a master painter of the Menri tradition, but seems to have developed most as an artist through the viewing and copying of Buddhist art encountered in his wide-ranging travels. Chöying Dorjé was especially interested in archaic styles and the art of Tibet’s neighbors, developing a highly personal idiom that incorporated features from what Tibetans called “Kashmir” (northwest India), Nepal, and China and was unusually versatile in styles from the Tibetan Yarlung (7th – 8th century), Chinese Song and Yuan, and fifteenth century Tibetan master artists. He was especially fond of the Chinese theme of the Sixteen Arhats, and painted sets of the subject multiple times. 

The Tenth Karmapa, Chöying Dorjé, was most influenced by Chinese painting styles, genres and techniques during his twenty-five year exile from central Tibet, mostly spent in Lijiang, Yunnan. He was a close contemporary of the Fifth Dalai Lama, but experienced the other side of geopolitical struggles of the seventeenth century, barely escaping with his life when Gushri Khan invaded in 1642 and, in securing the Fifth Dalai Lama’s throne, persecuted the Kagyu. One the most engaging accounts from his life is described in the introductory chapters by Irmgard Mengele and Debreczeny, which detail the arduous solo journeys undertaken in disguise back into Tibet to find young Karma Kagyu reincarnations and bring them back to Lijiang for training, thus preserving the lineage.

Chöying Dorjé’s “Chinese thangka painting” featured the Chinese conventions for the asymmetrical arrangement of figures, whose activities transpired in sparse, open landscapes. His “figural style is quite distinctive, especially in his fleshy elongated heads, featuring simple abbreviated faces with tiny, red, pursed lips (125).” His love of animals, especially birds, is mentioned in his biographies and animals appear in his paintings rendered with special sensitivity, naturalism and often playfulness.  From the age of nine until the end of his life, he painted works based upon visions and dreams, and delighted in compositions of his own design.

Despite his unique style, Chöying Dorjé’s mixture of styles and periods have made attribution of his works challenging. This task of the art historian is further compounded by the workshops of trained artists Chöying Dorjé employed. Debreczeny devotes several chapters to first a detailed analysis of the set of seven paintings securely dated to 1660 and inscribed by Chöying Dorjé as made “in their entirety by his own hand” (chapter 3). These then serve as an “anchor” against which other works may be compared, as Debreczeny does in the following three chapters regarding painting sets of the Sixteen Arhats (chapter 4) and Deeds of the Buddha (chapter 5), and in reevaluation of works previously attributed to Chöying Dorjé (chapter 6), and Ian Alsop takes up in regard to debate about sculptures (chapter 8). These chapters offer formal analysis, while also exploring the complicated cultural and religious questions of authorship, which can imply the artists’ own hand, his design, his workshop, or a style he initiated.

What might be of most interest to the Buddhist scholar or practitioner is the sheer number of functions that Chöying Dorjé and his associates ascribed to or engaged in through the production and viewing of religious art; I counted at least two dozen. Chöying Dorjé examined art constantly, commenting on and differentiating between its religious power and aesthetic value; he copied paintings and drew statues as a means to training, and to put back into circulation through copies images he cared for. He created works for life cycle events such as ordinations, enthronements, deaths, and as gifts for the faithful to encourage their practice. He made paintings to outfit new temples, and to serve as objects for receiving the confession, prostrations, and offerings of devotees, i.e. for merit making. Chöying Dorjé also calls upon the efficacy of paintings of the divinities as witnesses to rituals, and to directly affect the environment in terminating illnesses, removing obstacles to long life, and even in subduing an army.

Chöying Dorjé, to an extent unprecedented even today, “did not feel bound by iconographic strictures and displayed a freedom of spirit in his innovations that were probably only afforded to an incarnation of his stature (72).” Yet, his place in Tibetan tradition is tentative; “while he is venerated as one of the great artists, his eccentric and even heterodox works had a limited impact on the largely conservative Tibetan orthodox traditions (277).”

The Black Hat Eccentric is likely to become an indispensible reference: it is thoroughly annotated (with 893 endnotes), richly illustrated not only with works by and attributed to the Tenth Karmapa, but examples of art to which he was likely exposed and would have been of contemporaneous or historical interest to him. Thus the reader is offered a thorough art history, but most importantly and uniquely, from the perspective of a remarkable artist, so that we can immerse ourselves in his visual world, and be all the more amazed by his unprecedented vision.

The publication was accompanied by “The Tenth Karmapa and Tibet’s Turbulent 17th Century Conference,” held November 9-11, 2012, at the Rubin Museum of Art, New York City.

Leigh Sangster is completing a Ph.D. from the Institute of Liberal Arts at Emory University and is Director of Programs at Maitripa College, Portland, Oregon.


Popular posts from this blog

The Power of Unbearable Compassion - Lion's Roar

Origin of mantra Karmapa Chenno

The Voice of America Interviews the Gyalwang Karmapa

Hwayue Foundation: Notification on the Cancellation of the Diamond Sutra Teaching - teaching by HH the 17th Karmapa

His Holiness 17th Karmapa’s First Visit to UK & Palpung Wales on the Road - Palpung Changchub Dargyeling

On Confidence in the Dharma: An Interview with H.H. the 16th Karmapa (Densal)

The Benefits of Veneration at Rumtek Monastery

Rival’s marriage strengthens Dorje’s claim for Karmapa title - Hindustan Times